Chism v. State
This text of 343 S.W.3d 368 (Chism v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Charles Chism appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Chism sought to vacate his convictions for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, forcible sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two counts of domestic assault in the second degree, section 565.073, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two concurrent fifteen year sentences and two concurrent seven year sentences. On appeal, he claims ineffective assistance of appellate and trial counsel. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 S.W.3d 368, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 915, 2011 WL 2565387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chism-v-state-moctapp-2011.