Chism v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Chism v. State

343 S.W.3d 368, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 915, 2011 WL 2565387

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2011·No. WD 72085·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Chism appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Chism sought to vacate his convictions for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, forcible sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two counts of domestic assault in the second degree, section 565.073, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two concurrent fifteen year sentences and two concurrent seven year sentences. On appeal, he claims ineffective assistance of appellate and trial counsel. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Charles Chism appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Chism sought to vacate his convictions for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, forcible sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two counts of domestic assault in the second degree, section 565.073, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and two concurrent fifteen year sentences and two concurrent seven year sentences. On appeal, he claims ineffective assistance of appellate and trial counsel. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Chism v. State, 343 S.W.3d 368, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 915, 2011 WL 2565387 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

343 S.W.3d 368 (Chism v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related