Chism v. State
837 S.W.2d 479, 310 Ark. 504, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 551
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chism v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 312 Ark. 559 →
Opinion
Appellant, Harold Edward Chism, by his attorney has filed for a rule on the clerk.
His attorney, Denny Hyslip, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chism v. State, 837 S.W.2d 479, 310 Ark. 504, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 551 (Ark. 1992).
837 S.W.2d 479 (Chism v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.