Chism v. Koehler

Sixth Circuit

Chism v. Koehler

527 F.2d 612

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 1976

DocketNos. 75-1989, 75-1990

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 527 F.2d 612 (Chism v. Koehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chism v. Koehler, 527 F.2d 612 (6th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Before WEICK, Circuit Judge, HOWARD T. MARKEY,* Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

Upon careful consideration of the record before the court together with the briefs and oral arguments of counsel the court concludes that the district court did not err in granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this action. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the baiis of the opinion of Senior United States District Judge Ralph M. Freeman reported at 392 F.Supp. 659 (E.D.Mich.1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Before WEICK, Circuit Judge, HOWARD T. MARKEY,* Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and LIVELY, Circuit Judge.

Upon careful consideration of the record before the court together with the briefs and oral arguments of counsel the court concludes that the district court did not err in granting the petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this action. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the baiis of the opinion of Senior United States District Judge Ralph M. Freeman reported at 392 F.Supp. 659 (E.D.Mich.1975).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 F.2d 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chism-v-koehler-ca6-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack