Chisholm v. Stengel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chisholm v. Stengel

11 A.D.2d 767, 205 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 767 (Chisholm v. Stengel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chisholm v. Stengel, 11 A.D.2d 767, 205 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action against the owner (defendant Rappaport) and operator (defendant Stengel) of an automobile to recover damages for personal injuries, in which said defendants served a third-party complaint on the corporate owner of a service station, alleging that it had made improper repairs to the brakes of the automobile of defendant Rappaport, the third-party corporate defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 4, 1960, denying its motion to dismiss the third-party complaint for insufficiency on its face (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106). Order affirmed, without costs. The issues raised by the pleadings should be resolved after a trial. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Christ, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action against the owner (defendant Rappaport) and operator (defendant Stengel) of an automobile to recover damages for personal injuries, in which said defendants served a third-party complaint on the corporate owner of a service station, alleging that it had made improper repairs to the brakes of the automobile of defendant Rappaport, the third-party corporate defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 4, 1960, denying its motion to dismiss the third-party complaint for insufficiency on its face (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106). Order affirmed, without costs. The issues raised by the pleadings should be resolved after a trial. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Christ, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 767, 205 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chisholm-v-stengel-nyappdiv-1960.