Chisholm v. State
229 S.W.3d 611, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 883, 2007 WL 1673913
This text of 229 S.W.3d 611 (Chisholm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chisholm v. State, 229 S.W.3d 611, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 883, 2007 WL 1673913 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
Thomas W. Chisholm appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. We affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 S.W.3d 611, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 883, 2007 WL 1673913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chisholm-v-state-moctapp-2007.