Chisholm v. State

229 S.W.3d 611, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 883, 2007 WL 1673913

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas W. Chisholm appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. We affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).