Chisholm v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chisholm v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

243 A.D. 851

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In view of the fact that the payment of the premium was tendered by the beneficiary’s agent without the co-operation or knowledge, so far as appears, of the insured, the tendered evidence of communications from the insured in relation to reinstatement was immaterial. All concur. (The judgment awards plaintiff death benefit under a life insurance policy. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In view of the fact that the payment of the premium was tendered by the beneficiary’s agent without the co-operation or knowledge, so far as appears, of the insured, the tendered evidence of communications from the insured in relation to reinstatement was immaterial. All concur. (The judgment awards plaintiff death benefit under a life insurance policy. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Chisholm v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance, 243 A.D. 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 851 (Chisholm v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.