Chisholm v. Abbott

First Circuit

Chisholm v. Abbott

76 F. 238, 22 C.C.A. 418, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2118

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 23, 1896·No. No. 140·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ordered, that whereas, no judge who concurred in the judgment desires that the petition for a rehearing be granted, except as to the matter of costs, the same is denied, except as to costs; and whereas, both parties have, by leave of court, been heard on briefs on the matter of costs, it is further ordered that the judgi ment heretofore entered be rescinded, and judgment be now entered as follows: The decree of the district court is reversed, and the case- is remanded to that court, with directions to enter a decree dividing equally the damages and the costs in that court, with costs for the appellants in this court. 73 Fed. 1022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ordered, that whereas, no judge who concurred in the judgment desires that the petition for a rehearing be granted, except as to the matter of costs, the same is denied, except as to costs; and whereas, both parties have, by leave of court, been heard on briefs on the matter of costs, it is further ordered that the judgi ment heretofore entered be rescinded, and judgment be now entered as follows: The decree of the district court is reversed, and the case- is remanded to that court, with directions to enter a decree dividing equally the damages and the costs in that court, with costs for the appellants in this court. 73 Fed. 1022.

Chisholm v. Abbott, 76 F. 238, 22 C.C.A. 418, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2118 (1st Cir. 1896).

Pincite

76 F. 238 (Chisholm v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related