Chirgwin v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chirgwin v. Board of Education

84 A.D.2d 736, 448 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.D.2d 736 (Chirgwin v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chirgwin v. Board of Education, 84 A.D.2d 736, 448 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County [737]*737(Amman, J., and a jury) entered on October 23, 1980, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $600,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After a review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Ross, Silverman and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County [737]*737(Amman, J., and a jury) entered on October 23, 1980, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $600,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After a review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Ross, Silverman and Fein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.2d 736, 448 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chirgwin-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1981.