Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Chiramonte v. State

Chiramonte v. State

881 So. 2d 1136, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10085, 2004 WL 1530827
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 2004
DocketNo. 2D03-4354
StatusPublished

This text of 881 So. 2d 1136 (Chiramonte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chiramonte v. State, 881 So. 2d 1136, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10085, 2004 WL 1530827 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

COVINGTON, Judge.

Michael Chiramonte appeals the restitution order entered following his guilty plea to burglary of a structure, grand theft, and grand theft of a motor vehicle. After a hearing, the court awarded the sum of $2100 in restitution for $2000 in damage to the truck and $100 for the cost of recovering stolen air tools. The State concedes, and we agree, that the $2000 assessment imposed by the court was based on improper hearsay evidence concerning the cost to repair damage to the truck. We reverse and remand the order entered April 28, 2003, for a new restitution hearing. See Sherwood v. State, 832 So.2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherwood v. State
832 So. 2d 926 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
881 So. 2d 1136, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10085, 2004 WL 1530827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiramonte-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.