Chipman v. Hibbard

8 Cal. 268
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1857·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

This is a bill in equity for a new trial, in an action of ejectment, on the ground of excessive damages, the remedy by motion for a new trial having been lost, without the fault, as is alleged, of the plaintiff. The ejectment suit was tried in the [271]*271Third District Court, and this bill is filed in the Fourth District Court.

We decided in the late case of Ricketts and Wife v. Johnson and others, that a Court of co-ordinate jurisdiction could not entertain proceedings to restrain the judgments of another. The plaintiffs should have proceeded before the District Court of the Third District.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chipman v. Hibbard, 8 Cal. 268 (Cal. 1857).

8 Cal. 268 (Chipman v. Hibbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cochrane v. McDonald
5 Coffey 235 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)