Chipman v. Foster

119 Mass. 189, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 112
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 27, 1875·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

Each of these drafts; upon its face, purports to be issued by the New England agency of the Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Company, and shows that Foster & Cole are the general agents of that corporation for the New England States, as well as that the draft is drawn in payment of a claim against the corporation. It thus appears that Foster & Cole, in drawing it, [191] acted only as agents of the corporation, as clearly as if they had repeated words expressing their agency after their signature; and they cannot be held personally liable as drawers thereof. Carpenter v. Farnsworth, 106 Mass. 561, and cases cited.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chipman v. Foster, 119 Mass. 189, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 112 (Mass. 1875).

119 Mass. 189 (Chipman v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Devonshire Financial Service Corp. v. Burns
4 Mass. App. Dec. 105 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1952)
Stern v. Lieberman
29 N.E.2d 839 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Berenson v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. of Liverpool
87 N.E. 687 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Miller v. Roach
22 N.E. 634 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Simpson v. Garland
72 Me. 40 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1881)