Chipman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

250 A.D. 867, 295 N.Y.S. 99, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9484

Opinion

Order setting aside the verdicts for plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. Under the circumstances shown in the record, it was within the discretion of the trial justice to set aside the verdicts for errors which he deemed prejudicial to the rights of defendants. The reasons given orally on the argument of the motion may not have been sound (Cf. Tumulty v. New York, New Haven & H. R. R. Co., 224 App. Div. 131), but the order entered later recites sufficient grounds for the action of the court. Under such circumstances, this court is reluctant to interfeie with the exercise of discretion of the justice presiding at the trial. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chipman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 250 A.D. 867, 295 N.Y.S. 99, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 867 (Chipman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tumulty v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
224 A.D. 131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)