Chipetine v. McEvoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chipetine v. McEvoy

198 A.D.2d 321, 605 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10692

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated July 31, 1991, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified, by adding a provision thereto that the moving papers and the answering papers are deemed the complaint and answer; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are material issues of fact which require trial. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated July 31, 1991, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified, by adding a provision thereto that the moving papers and the answering papers are deemed the complaint and answer; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are material issues of fact which require trial. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Chipetine v. McEvoy, 198 A.D.2d 321, 605 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

198 A.D.2d 321 (Chipetine v. McEvoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related