Chinsky v. Chinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chinsky v. Chinsky

52 A.D.2d 933, 384 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 933 (Chinsky v. Chinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chinsky v. Chinsky, 52 A.D.2d 933, 384 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 9, 1975, as, on his cross motion to reduce alimony and child support payments, only reduced those payments to $140 per week. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for a hearing to determine the true financial status of the parties, in order to arrive at proper alimony and support awards, and for the entry of an appropriate order thereon. Pending the outcome of such hearing, defendant is ordered to continue making payments of $140 per week. On the sparse record presented herein, a determination cannot be made as to whether the alimony and support payments required of defendant are excessive. The hearing should be held without delay. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 9, 1975, as, on his cross motion to reduce alimony and child support payments, only reduced those payments to $140 per week. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for a hearing to determine the true financial status of the parties, in order to arrive at proper alimony and support awards, and for the entry of an appropriate order thereon. Pending the outcome of such hearing, defendant is ordered to continue making payments of $140 per week. On the sparse record presented herein, a determination cannot be made as to whether the alimony and support payments required of defendant are excessive. The hearing should be held without delay. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 933, 384 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chinsky-v-chinsky-nyappdiv-1976.