Chinese Daily News v. National Labor Relations Board

224 F. App'x 6
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2007
DocketNos. 06-1159, 06-1206
StatusPublished

This text of 224 F. App'x 6 (Chinese Daily News v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chinese Daily News v. National Labor Relations Board, 224 F. App'x 6 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This petition for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board and the corresponding cross-application for enforcement were presented to the court and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the cross-application for enforcement be granted.

The Board found that the Chinese Daily News violated Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act on multiple occasions during the pendency of a challenge to an election to unionize the Chinese Daily News’s Monterey Park facility. The Chinese Daily News petitions for review of several, but not all, of these findings of violation. We conclude the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and was reasonable.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 F. App'x 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chinese-daily-news-v-national-labor-relations-board-cadc-2007.