Chinese Arts & Products, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 299
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 3, 1955
DocketNo. 58801; protests 231325-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 299 (Chinese Arts & Products, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chinese Arts & Products, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 299 (cusc 1955).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of [300]*300brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Fan Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Cust. Ct. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chinese-arts-products-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.