Chinese Art Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Chinese Art Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 298, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 611

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 23, 1954

DocketNo. 58212; protests 154812-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 298 (Chinese Art Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chinese Art Co. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 298, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 611 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Cust. Ct. 298, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chinese-art-co-v-united-states-cusc-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack