Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas
This text of Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas (Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00793-CR
Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. CR2022-102B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi was convicted of two counts of bail jumping and
sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment in each count. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.42, 38.10.
Following his conviction, an attorney was appointed to represent Ogbuehi on appeal. Ogbuehi’s
appointed counsel has now filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Attached to the motion is
Ogbuehi’s letter to counsel stating that Ogbuehi wants to represent himself and asking counsel
to withdraw.
Indigent defendants are entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal.
Cooks v. State, 240 S.W.3d 906, 910 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). The legislature has given the trial
court the responsibility of appointing counsel in criminal proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). When counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See
Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Vercher v. State
No. 03-13-00799-CR, 2014 WL 2573747, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 5, 2014, no pet.)
(mem. op. & order, not designated for publication); see also Burnett v. State, 959 S.W.2d 652,
655 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. ref’d) (noting that appointed counsel has legal
duty to represent defendant until officially relieved of obligation by court or appeal is
exhausted); Bell v. State, 723 S.W.2d 317, 317 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, order) (explaining that
“[t]his Court will not allow appointed counsel to withdraw, thereby leaving an indigent appellant
without counsel”).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand
the cause to the trial court to hold a hearing. See Bell, 723 S.W.3d at 317; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 43.6 (permitting courts of appeals to make “any other appropriate order that the law and the
nature of the case require”). Upon remand, counsel is instructed to re-file his motion to
withdraw with the trial court. During the hearing, the trial court shall admonish Ogbuehi about
his right to be represented by counsel on appeal and the dangers and disadvantages of proceeding
pro se, see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 1.051(g), and shall determine whether Ogbuehi desires to
prosecute his appeal. Depending on what the trial court determines, it shall either grant
counsel’s motion and discharge counsel, deny counsel’s motion, or alternatively, grant the
motion and substitute a new appointed counsel that will effectively represent Ogbuehi on appeal.
The trial court will advise Ogbuehi or his appointed counsel that his appellant’s
brief is due within thirty days of the date of the trial court’s hearing. The trial court shall make
appropriate written findings and recommendations. Following the hearing, which shall be
transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings, conclusions, and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this
Court no later than July 3, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d) (authorizing
supplementation of clerk’s and reporter’s records).
It is ordered on June 6, 2024.
Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly
Abated and Remanded
Filed: June 6, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chineme-reginald-ogbuehi-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.