Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 6, 2024
Docket03-23-00793-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas (Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00793-CR

Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. CR2022-102B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi was convicted of two counts of bail jumping and

sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment in each count. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.42, 38.10.

Following his conviction, an attorney was appointed to represent Ogbuehi on appeal. Ogbuehi’s

appointed counsel has now filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Attached to the motion is

Ogbuehi’s letter to counsel stating that Ogbuehi wants to represent himself and asking counsel

to withdraw.

Indigent defendants are entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal.

Cooks v. State, 240 S.W.3d 906, 910 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). The legislature has given the trial

court the responsibility of appointing counsel in criminal proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). When counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See

Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Vercher v. State

No. 03-13-00799-CR, 2014 WL 2573747, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 5, 2014, no pet.)

(mem. op. & order, not designated for publication); see also Burnett v. State, 959 S.W.2d 652,

655 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. ref’d) (noting that appointed counsel has legal

duty to represent defendant until officially relieved of obligation by court or appeal is

exhausted); Bell v. State, 723 S.W.2d 317, 317 (Tex. App.—Austin 1987, order) (explaining that

“[t]his Court will not allow appointed counsel to withdraw, thereby leaving an indigent appellant

without counsel”).

We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand

the cause to the trial court to hold a hearing. See Bell, 723 S.W.3d at 317; see also Tex. R. App.

P. 43.6 (permitting courts of appeals to make “any other appropriate order that the law and the

nature of the case require”). Upon remand, counsel is instructed to re-file his motion to

withdraw with the trial court. During the hearing, the trial court shall admonish Ogbuehi about

his right to be represented by counsel on appeal and the dangers and disadvantages of proceeding

pro se, see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 1.051(g), and shall determine whether Ogbuehi desires to

prosecute his appeal. Depending on what the trial court determines, it shall either grant

counsel’s motion and discharge counsel, deny counsel’s motion, or alternatively, grant the

motion and substitute a new appointed counsel that will effectively represent Ogbuehi on appeal.

The trial court will advise Ogbuehi or his appointed counsel that his appellant’s

brief is due within thirty days of the date of the trial court’s hearing. The trial court shall make

appropriate written findings and recommendations. Following the hearing, which shall be

transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings, conclusions, and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this

Court no later than July 3, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d) (authorizing

supplementation of clerk’s and reporter’s records).

It is ordered on June 6, 2024.

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 6, 2024

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Enriquez v. State
999 S.W.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Burnett v. State
959 S.W.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Cooks v. State
240 S.W.3d 906 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Bell v. State
723 S.W.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chineme Reginald Ogbuehi v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chineme-reginald-ogbuehi-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.