Chinaware & Glass Trading Corp. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 322
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 11, 1958
DocketNo. 62176; protest 212249-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 322 (Chinaware & Glass Trading Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chinaware & Glass Trading Corp. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 322 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the items described on the invoice as “Archaic White Number 3,” consisting of 79 ashtrays, which were appraised at 70 cents each, are dutiable at the rate in effect at that time, “at 35 per cent ad valorem, instead of at 50, as assessed.” The court held that while the entry herein was dated November 15, 1951, and estimated duties were paid on November 16, 1951, the inspector’s report on the back of the entry permit was dated December 4, 1951, and presumably, therefore, the entry transaction was not completed until after November 17, 1951, the effective date of the modification of paragraph 211 by the Torquay protocol. (United States v. Mussman & Shafer, Inc., 40 C. C. P. A. 108, C. A. D. 506, cited.) On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Cust. Ct. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chinaware-glass-trading-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1958.