China Terminal & Electric Corp. v. Willemsen
181 L. Ed. 2d 1, 132 S. Ct. 75, 565 U.S. 802, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6804, 80 U.S.L.W. 3180
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1262
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 1 (China Terminal & Electric Corp. v. Willemsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
China Terminal & Electric Corp. v. Willemsen, 181 L. Ed. 2d 1, 132 S. Ct. 75, 565 U.S. 802, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6804, 80 U.S.L.W. 3180 (U.S. 2011).
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further consideration in light of J. McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 2780, 180 L. Ed. 2d 765 (2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Willemsen v. Invacare Corporation
282 P.3d 867 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 1, 132 S. Ct. 75, 565 U.S. 802, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6804, 80 U.S.L.W. 3180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/china-terminal-electric-corp-v-willemsen-scotus-2011.