China Man Way Fur Corp. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 355
United States Customs Court·Decided July 10, 1957·No. No. 61022; protest 936432-G (New York)·Published
Opinions
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and that the items marked “B” consist of goatskins similar to those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
China Man Way Fur Corp. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 355 (cusc 1957).
39 Cust. Ct. 355 (China Man Way Fur Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prime Fur Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)