China Dry Goods Co. v. United States
This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 324 (China Dry Goods Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Marshall Field & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained, with the exception of such merchandise shown on entry 5286, under protest 326138-K, which was entered prior to June 30, 1956. Said merchandise was held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Cust. Ct. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/china-dry-goods-co-v-united-states-cusc-1959.