China Dry Goods Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 374
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 12, 1955
DocketNo. 59058; protests 237217-K, etc. (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 374 (China Dry Goods Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
China Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 374 (cusc 1955).

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Cust. Ct. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/china-dry-goods-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.