China Artware Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 300
United States Customs Court·Decided March 3, 1955·No. No. 58803; protest 216743-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

China Artware Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 300 (cusc 1955).

34 Cust. Ct. 300 (China Artware Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Fan Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)