China Artware Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

China Artware Co. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 300

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1955

DocketNo. 58803; protest 216743-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 300 (China Artware Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

China Artware Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 300 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/china-artware-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack