Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Chin v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Chin v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

284 A.D.2d 491, 726 N.Y.S.2d 582, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6833
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated January 31, 2001, which denied their motion to preclude the defendant from offering evidence at trial pertaining to its twelfth affirmative defense.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to preclude the defendant from offering evidence at trial pertaining to its twelfth affirmative defense (see, Harris v City of New York, 211 AD2d 663, 664; Vatel v City of New York, 208 AD2d 524; Coleman v Richards, 138 AD2d 556). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chin v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 284 A.D.2d 491, 726 N.Y.S.2d 582, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 491 (Chin v. Sears Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Richards
138 A.D.2d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Vatel v. City of New York
208 A.D.2d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Harris v. City of New York
211 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)