Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2022
Docket21-15638
StatusUnpublished

This text of Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams (Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams, (9th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHIMYERE McCALL; MONROE No. 21-15638 McCALL, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05126-SMB Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. MEMORANDUM*

DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant,

ZENE WILLIAMS,

Counter-claimant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Damon Charles Williams and Zene Williams appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment in Chimyere and Monroe McCall’s diversity action. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

summary judgment. Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 1026 (9th Cir. 2013).

We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’

declaratory relief claim because the debt underlying the liens had been discharged

in bankruptcy. See In re Ybarra, 424 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir. 2005) (“A Chapter

7 bankruptcy discharge releases the debtor from personal liability for her pre-

bankruptcy debts.”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’

wrongful lien claim as to the May 30, 2019 lien because defendants knew or had

reason to know that the May 30, 2019 lien was groundless. See Ariz. Rev. Stat.

§ 33-420(A) (authorizing special action on the ground that a lien against real

property is groundless or otherwise invalid); Webber v. Grindle Audio Prods., Inc.,

60 P.3d 224, 230 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002) (upholding liability under § 33-420(A) for

recording judgment liens when creditor knew that the judgment had been

discharged in bankruptcy).

We reject as without merit defendants’ contentions that the district court was

biased.

AFFIRMED.

2 21-15638

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edward Furnace v. Paul Sullivan
705 F.3d 1021 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Webber v. Grindle Audio Productions, Inc.
60 P.3d 224 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chimyere-mccall-v-damon-williams-ca9-2022.