Chimerine v. World Champion John Chung Tae Kwon Do Institute
225 A.D.2d 323, 638 N.Y.2d 474, 638 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2095
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff, by her voluntary participation as a student in martial arts classes conducted by defendants, consented to the activity resulting in her injury, the risk of which was a foreseeable consequence of her participation (see, Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432, 439; Morales v New York City Hous. Auth., 187 AD2d 295). Moreover, there was no evidence that defendants breached a duty of care owed to plaintiff. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chimerine v. World Champion John Chung Tae Kwon Do Institute, 225 A.D.2d 323, 638 N.Y.2d 474, 638 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 323 (Chimerine v. World Champion John Chung Tae Kwon Do Institute) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vendura v. Fasano
236 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Beck v. Scimeca
229 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)