Chimel v. California

393 U.S. 1011, 89 S. Ct. 637

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chimel v. California. Read the opinion of the Court — 395 U.S. 752 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 13, 1969·No. No. 770·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Cal. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 958.] Joint motion to dispense with printing appendix denied. Request by petitioner for additional time for oral argument denied. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald M. George, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent on the joint motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chimel v. California, 393 U.S. 1011, 89 S. Ct. 637 (1969).

Pincite

393 U.S. 1011 (Chimel v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.