Chimchirian v. Helvering

125 F.2d 746, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 258, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1138, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4462
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 26, 1942·No. No. 7902·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The reasons given and the conclusions reached in the opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals1 are, in our opinion, correct. Petitioner’s contention that the Board abused its discretion in denying his motion for a rehearing is without merit.2 We therefore affirm its decision and approve its order.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chimchirian v. Helvering, 125 F.2d 746, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 258, 28 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1138, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4462 (D.C. Cir. 1942).

125 F.2d 746 (Chimchirian v. Helvering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armaganian v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 305 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Brewster v. Commissioner
1977 T.C. Memo. 366 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Anthony v. Commissioner
1976 T.C. Memo. 302 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Estate of Haseltine v. Commissioner
1976 T.C. Memo. 278 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Halling v. Commissioner
1968 T.C. Memo. 232 (U.S. Tax Court, 1968)
Bon Realty Co. v. Commissioner
1967 T.C. Memo. 131 (U.S. Tax Court, 1967)
Robinson's Dairy, Inc. v. Commissioner
35 T.C. 601 (U.S. Tax Court, 1961)