Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Chilton v. State

Chilton v. State

978 So. 2d 848, 2008 WL 899032
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 2008
Docket1D07-5477
StatusPublished

This text of 978 So. 2d 848 (Chilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chilton v. State, 978 So. 2d 848, 2008 WL 899032 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

978 So.2d 848 (2008)

Timothy CHILTON, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D07-5477.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 4, 2008.

Timothy Chilton, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, BENTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
978 So. 2d 848, 2008 WL 899032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chilton-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.