Chilton v. Rolph

California Court of Appeal

Chilton v. Rolph

58 Cal. App. 787

California Court of Appeal·Decided July 11, 1922·No. Civ. No. 4318·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of - appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Bichards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of - appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Bichards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.

Chilton v. Rolph, 58 Cal. App. 787 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

58 Cal. App. 787 (Chilton v. Rolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related