Chilton v. Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Chilton v. Hunt

122 S.E.2d 391, 255 N.C. 618, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 651

DecidedNovember 8, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E.2d 391 (Chilton v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chilton v. Hunt, 122 S.E.2d 391, 255 N.C. 618, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 651 (N.C. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR CtjRiam.

The petitioner having entered no exceptions to the evidence adduced at the original hearing, or to the findings of fact made by the Board of Alcoholic Control based on such evidence, and since such findings support the judgment, the judgment will be upheld. Goldsboro v. R.R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486; Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223; James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 86 S.E. 2d 759.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR CtjRiam.

The petitioner having entered no exceptions to the evidence adduced at the original hearing, or to the findings of fact made by the Board of Alcoholic Control based on such evidence, and since such findings support the judgment, the judgment will be upheld. Goldsboro v. R.R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486; Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223; James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 86 S.E. 2d 759.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E.2d 391, 255 N.C. 618, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chilton-v-hunt-nc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack