Chilton v. Carbondale

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Chilton v. Carbondale

28 A. 833, 160 Pa. 463, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 830

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 26, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 176

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 28 A. 833 (Chilton v. Carbondale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chilton v. Carbondale, 28 A. 833, 160 Pa. 463, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 830 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We see no error in this case that requires us to reverse the judgment. The question of the plaintiff’s contributory neglir gence, upon the evidence,- was one for the jury. It was submitted in a- charge that was both fair and adequate, and the [466]*466jury has found that she was not guilty of negligence that contributed in any degree to the injury of which she complains'. Whether their conclusion is correct is not for us to consider. The question was for them, and it was properly left to them.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We see no error in this case that requires us to reverse the judgment. The question of the plaintiff’s contributory neglir gence, upon the evidence,- was one for the jury. It was submitted in a- charge that was both fair and adequate, and the [466]*466jury has found that she was not guilty of negligence that contributed in any degree to the injury of which she complains'. Whether their conclusion is correct is not for us to consider. The question was for them, and it was properly left to them.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A. 833, 160 Pa. 463, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chilton-v-carbondale-pa-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack