Chiles v. Stephens
This text of 8 Ky. 333 (Chiles v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Chiles having been neither party nor privy to the habere facias possessionem, given in evidence in this case, or to the judgment and decree upon which the same issued, cannot be bound thereby; and the entry upon the premises, of which he was in the actual possession under an adverse [334]*334claim, and-the detention of the possession from him by co? l°r °f su°h process, were unauthorised and illegal.
A majority of the court are therefore of opinion, that Chiles might maintain a warrant of forcible entry and de-ta‘ner to iegain the possession, and that the circuit court erred in deciding otherwise.
Judgment reversed with cost, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. 333, 1 A.K. Marsh. 333, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiles-v-stephens-kyctapp-1818.