Chiles v. PSC NOMINATING COUNCIL
This text of 573 So. 2d 829 (Chiles v. PSC NOMINATING COUNCIL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lawton CHILES, Etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION NOMINATING COUNCIL, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
*830 J. Hardin Peterson, Tallahassee, for Governor-Elect Lawton Chiles.
Peter M. Dunbar, Counsel, Deborah K. Kearney, Deputy Counsel and Gregory C. Smith, Asst. General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Governor Bob Martinez.
Michael Pearce Dodson, and Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Louis F. Hubener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
Mallory E. Horne and D. Stephen Kahn, Tallahassee, for Gwen Margolis, as President of The Florida Senate.
Thomas R. Tedcastle, Tallahassee, for T.K. Wetherell, as Speaker of The Florida House of Representatives, Tallahassee, amicus curiae on behalf of the Florida Legislature.
OVERTON, Justice.
Petitioners filed a petition for a writ of prohibition seeking to prevent the Public Service Commission Nominating Council from exercising its authority, set forth in section 350.031, Florida Statutes (1989), to appoint two public service commissioners for positions that became vacant on January 8, 1991, because of the failure of Governor Martinez to make such appointments prior to December 1, 1990. Petitioners contend that the nominating council's exercise of its statutory authority in this matter unconstitutionally limits the appointing authority of the governor.[1] We issued an order to show cause, received responses from all interested parties, and heard oral argument on January 7, 1991. For the reasons expressed, we deny the petition.
The question concerns the constitutional authority of the Public Service Commission Nominating Council to exercise its statutorily provided authority to make these appointments. Section 350.031, Florida Statutes (1989), sets out the procedure for the appointment of persons to vacant public service commissioner positions.[2] The statute *831 provides that the governor is directed to fill a vacant position by appointing one of at least three persons recommended by the Florida Public Service Commission Nominating Council. The members of this council are appointed by the president of the senate, by the speaker of the house, and by other appointed members of the nominating council. Under the statute, when a vacancy occurs due to the expiration of a term, the recommendations must be submitted to the governor by October 1, and the governor is directed to make the appointment by December 1. The statute provides that "[i]f the Governor has not made an appointment by December 1 to fill a vacancy for a term to begin the following January, then the council, by majority vote, shall appoint by December 31 one person from the names previously recommended to the Governor to fill the vacancy." § 350.031(4), Fla. Stat. (1989). On or before October 1, 1990, the Public Service Commission Nominating Council presented a list of three nominees for each of two positions to Governor Bob Martinez. Governor Martinez did not make the appointments by December 1, 1990. He, together with Governor-Elect Lawton Chiles, filed this petition on December 13, 1990, the day before the Public Service Commission Nominating Council was scheduled to meet to make the appointment of the two public service commissioners in accordance with the statute. We issued to the nominating council an order to show cause, which stayed its authority to act on December 14, 1990, and until we ruled on this matter.
The governor's office contends that the Public Service Commission Nominating Council does not have the authority to appoint public service commissioners because the constitution vests the supreme executive power of the state to appoint these state officials solely in the governor. Petitioners reason that the 1868 Constitution *832 contained a provision expressly giving the power to the governor to make all appointments to non-elected state offices (article III, section 27, Florida Constitution (1868)), and that this provision was carried forward in the 1885 Constitution. Petitioners recognize that the present Florida Constitution does not contain this provision and that the definition of what powers are within the governor's executive power is not expressly set out in our present constitution. The general provision vesting the supreme executive power in the governor is contained in article IV, section 1(a), of the Florida Constitution. Petitioners reason that, when the 1968 constitutional revision was adopted, the people of this state had long lived with the proposition that there were two methods of attaining public office, either by election or by appointment by the governor, and that the appointment power of the governor should be construed as an integral part of the supreme executive power. Petitioners contend that, since a public service commissioner is a state officer and the state constitution does not provide a method for filling a vacancy on the Public Service Commission, the general appointment power of the governor to fill vacancies controls over any general law. Petitioners also assert that the statute directly conflicts with article IV, section 1(f), of the Florida Constitution, with regard to filling vacancies for the remainder of an unexpired term. Petitioners conclude that section 350.031, Florida Statutes (1989), is unconstitutional because it directly conflicts with the governor's general and express power of appointment. Additionally, petitioners claim that, as a matter of public policy, members of the Public Service Commission should be appointed only by an elected official since they are state officers and exercise a portion of the sovereign authority of this state.
We reject these contentions because we find that the Public Service Commission is an entity of the legislative branch and, as such, the legislature has the authority to establish by law how legislative branch officials, including these Public Service Commission members, may be selected. We reject the assertion that the Public Service Commission is, in reality, an entity of the executive branch.
We realize that some of the functions given the Public Service Commission are executive in nature because it is directed to enforce laws. The commission also performs quasi-judicial functions. However, its primary function is setting rates, which is legislative in nature. The legislature, in creating the Public Service Commission, expressly stated that the Public Service Commission is part of the legislative branch. Section 350.001, Florida Statutes (1989), provides:
The Florida Public Service Commission has been and shall continue to be an arm of the legislative branch of government. It is the desire of the Legislature that the Governor participate in the appointment process of commissioners to the Public Service Commission. The Legislature accordingly delegates to the Governor a limited authority with respect to the Public Service Commission by authorizing him to participate in the selection of members only from the list provided by the Florida Public Service Commission Nominating Council in the manner prescribed by s. 350.031.
(Emphasis added.)
We previously expressed the view, which we now reaffirm, that public utility rate-making by the Public Service Commission is a legislative function. In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 223 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1969); Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Comm'rs, 100 Fla. 538, 129 So. 876 (1930). In Commission on Ethics v. Sullivan, 489 So.2d 10 (Fla.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 829, 1991 WL 6561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiles-v-psc-nominating-council-fla-1991.