Chiles v. Holloway

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Chiles v. Holloway

15 S.C.L. 164

DecidedJanuary 15, 1827

StatusPublished

This text of 15 S.C.L. 164 (Chiles v. Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chiles v. Holloway, 15 S.C.L. 164 (S.C. Ct. App. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Waties, J.

who heard the case dismissed the rule.— He thought the sheriff had no authority to receive the-money but what he derived from the execution, and that a payment made to the deputy before the sheriff himself' was authorised to receive it,, could not-render the sheriff Hable. The party paying must look to the deputy.

The Court of Appeals confirmed his honor’s judgment.

Rule dismissedl.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waties, J.

who heard the case dismissed the rule.— He thought the sheriff had no authority to receive the-money but what he derived from the execution, and that a payment made to the deputy before the sheriff himself' was authorised to receive it,, could not-render the sheriff Hable. The party paying must look to the deputy.

The Court of Appeals confirmed his honor’s judgment.

Rule dismissedl.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.C.L. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiles-v-holloway-scctapp-1827.