Childs v. Edmunds

10 P. 130, 2 Cal. Unrep. 649
California Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1886·No. No. 11,498·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the COURT.

The application for a writ of prohibition in this case is denied for the reason that petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal from the order complained of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Childs v. Edmunds, 10 P. 130, 2 Cal. Unrep. 649 (Cal. 1886).

10 P. 130 (Childs v. Edmunds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Havemeyer v. Superior Court
24 P. 121 (California Supreme Court, 1890)