Home/California Supreme Court/Childs v. Edmunds

Childs v. Edmunds

10 P. 130, 2 Cal. Unrep. 649
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 9, 1886
DocketNo. 11,498
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 P. 130 (Childs v. Edmunds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Childs v. Edmunds, 10 P. 130, 2 Cal. Unrep. 649 (Cal. 1886).

Opinion

By the COURT.

The application for a writ of prohibition in this case is denied for the reason that petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal from the order complained of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Havemeyer v. Superior Court
24 P. 121 (California Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 P. 130, 2 Cal. Unrep. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childs-v-edmunds-cal-1886.