Childs v. Childs

144 A.D. 167, 128 N.Y.S. 781, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1651
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1911·No. No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Scott, J.:

Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was properly denied, because it was premature. An amended complaint had been served, but it had not been answered or demurred to. [168] Consequently the cause was not at issue, and there were, properly speaking, no pleadings upon which an order for judgment could be based. Section 547 of the Code of Civil Procedure clearly contemplates tljat a. motion under it shall be made only when the cause is at issue, and it would have been a simple to have served an answer or demurred bis motion. The order appealed from ten dollars costs and disbursements. matter for defendant and then have made must be affirmed, with

Ingraham,- P. J., McLaughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ.,. concurred. j

Order affirmed, with] ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Childs v. Childs, 144 A.D. 167, 128 N.Y.S. 781, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

144 A.D. 167 (Childs v. Childs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Regis Paper Co. v. Hano
141 Misc. 75 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Anglo & London-Paris National Bank v. S. A. Jacobson Co.
196 A.D. 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)