Childress v. United States

442 F. App'x 787
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2011
DocketNo. 09-2408
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F. App'x 787 (Childress v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Childress v. United States, 442 F. App'x 787 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald M. Childress appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss his claims against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [788]*788error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Childress v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-03922-RJC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2671-2680
28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F. App'x 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childress-v-united-states-ca4-2011.