Childress v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Childress v. United States

442 F. App'x 787

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2011·No. No. 09-2408·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald M. Childress appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss his claims against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [788]*788error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Childress v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-03922-RJC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald M. Childress appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss his claims against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [788]*788error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Childress v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-03922-RJC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Childress v. United States, 442 F. App'x 787 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

442 F. App'x 787 (Childress v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related