Childress v. United States
This text of 442 F. App'x 787 (Childress v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald M. Childress appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss his claims against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [788]*788error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Childress v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-03922-RJC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 F. App'x 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childress-v-united-states-ca4-2011.