Childress v. St. John's Mercy Medical Center

Missouri Court of Appeals

Childress v. St. John's Mercy Medical Center

849 S.W.2d 616, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 309, 1993 WL 50946

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1993·No. No. 61638·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Family appeals a jury verdict in favor of Defendants in their wrongful death action. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining Defendants’ motion to strike Family’s expert witness. Further, the trial court did not plainly err in allowing Defendants to draw an adverse inference from Family’s failure to call a neurologist. Therefore, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Family appeals a jury verdict in favor of Defendants in their wrongful death action. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining Defendants’ motion to strike Family’s expert witness. Further, the trial court did not plainly err in allowing Defendants to draw an adverse inference from Family’s failure to call a neurologist. Therefore, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only.

Childress v. St. John's Mercy Medical Center, 849 S.W.2d 616, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 309, 1993 WL 50946 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

849 S.W.2d 616 (Childress v. St. John's Mercy Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.