Home/California Court of Appeal/Childress v. Peterson

Childress v. Peterson

105 P.2d 376, 40 Cal. App. 2d 590, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 147
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 12, 1940
DocketCiv. No. 2715
StatusPublished

This text of 105 P.2d 376 (Childress v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Childress v. Peterson, 105 P.2d 376, 40 Cal. App. 2d 590, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 147 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

MARKS, Acting P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal because appellants' opening brief was not filed within the time provided by section 4 of rule I of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

Our record shows that the cleik’s and reporter's transcripts were filed on June 22, 1940. On August 19, 1940, respondents filed their notice of motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants ’ opening brief was filed on the same day. This has been held a sufficient answer to the motion to dismiss. (Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564] ; North v. Evans, 114 Cal. App. 714 [300 Pac. 893] ; Lisle v. Ragle, 10 Cal. App. (2d) 758 [52 Pac. (2d) 608] ; Hall v. Wolford, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 537 [71 Pac. (2d) 596].)

The motion is denied.

Griffin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Wolford
71 P.2d 596 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
Lisle v. Ragle
52 P.2d 608 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
North v. Evans
300 P. 893 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
297 P. 564 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 P.2d 376, 40 Cal. App. 2d 590, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childress-v-peterson-calctapp-1940.