Childress v. First Citizens Bank

540 F. App'x 157
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 26, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1886
StatusPublished

This text of 540 F. App'x 157 (Childress v. First Citizens Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Childress v. First Citizens Bank, 540 F. App'x 157 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tessa Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging a violation of the federal Wiretap Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Childress’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chil-dress has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 F. App'x 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childress-v-first-citizens-bank-ca4-2013.