Childers v. State

2015 Ark. 451
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 3, 2015
DocketCR-15-880
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. 451 (Childers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Childers v. State, 2015 Ark. 451 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. 451

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-880

ANNA CHRISTINE CHILDERS Opinion Delivered December 3, 2015 APPELLANT AMENDED MOTION FOR RULE V. ON CLERK

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE MOTION GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

Appellant Anna Christine Childers, by and through her attorney, has filed an amended

motion for rule on clerk. Her attorney, Philip C. Wilson, states in the motion that the record

has not been timely lodged due to a mistake on his part.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated

appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said that there

are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or

attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or, there is “good reason.” 356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d

at 891. We explained as follows:

Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present. Cite as 2015 Ark. 451

Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an

affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit

fault when he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. See id.

In accordance with McDonald, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883, Mr. Wilson has

candidly admitted fault. The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be

forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. State
146 S.W.3d 883 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childers-v-state-ark-2015.