Childers v. State
This text of 2015 Ark. 451 (Childers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2015 Ark. 451
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-880
ANNA CHRISTINE CHILDERS Opinion Delivered December 3, 2015 APPELLANT AMENDED MOTION FOR RULE V. ON CLERK
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE MOTION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
Appellant Anna Christine Childers, by and through her attorney, has filed an amended
motion for rule on clerk. Her attorney, Philip C. Wilson, states in the motion that the record
has not been timely lodged due to a mistake on his part.
This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated
appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said that there
are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or
attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or, there is “good reason.” 356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d
at 891. We explained as follows:
Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present. Cite as 2015 Ark. 451
Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an
affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit
fault when he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. See id.
In accordance with McDonald, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883, Mr. Wilson has
candidly admitted fault. The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be
forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 Ark. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childers-v-state-ark-2015.