Childers v. Customer Direct, LLC

443 S.W.3d 49, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1051, 2014 WL 4702823
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2014·No. No. ED 101252·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Chüders (Employee) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there is sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision, and the Commission did not err as a matter of law in finding Employee engaged in misconduct connected with work. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D. 2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Childers v. Customer Direct, LLC, 443 S.W.3d 49, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1051, 2014 WL 4702823 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

443 S.W.3d 49 (Childers v. Customer Direct, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College
205 S.W.3d 291 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)