Childers v. City of Greenville

69 Ala. 103
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BBIOKELL, C. J.

The present action is founded on the theory that a lien had attached to the building, which was in course of construction for the value of the brick the appellant had sold to Ford, with whom the appellee had contracted for the erection of the building, and who was to supply the proper material. The lien exists iii such case only when there is a balance due from the proprietor to the contractor, and extends only to such balance. — Geiger v. Hussey, 63 Ala. 338. The evidence showing clearly, and being undisputed, that there was [104]*104no amount due from the city to Eord, on account of the contract for the construction of the building, the Circuit Court properly instructed the jury to find for the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Childers v. City of Greenville, 69 Ala. 103 (Ala. 1881).

69 Ala. 103 (Childers v. City of Greenville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May & Thomas Hardware Co. v. McConnell
102 Ala. 577 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)