Childers v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Childers v. City of Atlanta

84 S.E.2d 50, 211 Ga. 130, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 497

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 13, 1954·No. 18646, 18647; 18648, 18649·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

In all material respects the issues of fact in the present cases are the same as those in Hartsfield v. Mitchell, 210 Ga. 197 (78 S. E. 2d 493), and the decision here is controlled by the rulings made in that case.

Judgments affirmed on both of the main bills of exceptions. Cross-bills of exceptions dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Welborn B. Cody, Hoke Smith, for plaintiffs in error. Thomas B. Branch, Jr., for parties at interest not parties to record. J. C. Savage, J. C. Murphy, Hamilton Lokey, J. M. B. Bloodloortli, Martin McFarland, Henry L. Bowden, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Justice.

In all material respects the issues of fact in the present cases are the same as those in Hartsfield v. Mitchell, 210 Ga. 197 (78 S. E. 2d 493), and the decision here is controlled by the rulings made in that case.

Judgments affirmed on both of the main bills of exceptions. Cross-bills of exceptions dismissed.

All the Justices concur. Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Welborn B. Cody, Hoke Smith, for plaintiffs in error. Thomas B. Branch, Jr., for parties at interest not parties to record. J. C. Savage, J. C. Murphy, Hamilton Lokey, J. M. B. Bloodloortli, Martin McFarland, Henry L. Bowden, contra.

Childers v. City of Atlanta, 84 S.E.2d 50, 211 Ga. 130, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 497 (Ga. 1954).

Pincite

84 S.E.2d 50 (Childers v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related