Childers Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board

653 F.2d 242, 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2435, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20044
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 1981
Docket79-1390
StatusPublished

This text of 653 F.2d 242 (Childers Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Childers Products Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 653 F.2d 242, 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2435, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20044 (6th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

ORDER

Childers Products Company petitions under Section 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board rendered June 19, 1979, that the Company violated Section 8(a)(1) & (5) of the Act by refusing to bargain with Teamsters Union Local 115 after the Union was certified as the employees’ bargaining agent in a representation election held in the summer of 1977. The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order of the same date that Childers shall bargain collectively with the Union upon request. The Board’s decision and order are reported at 242 N.L.R.B. No. 182 (1979).

*243 The Union won the representation election, eight votes to six. The Board declared three additional Childers employees ineligible to vote in the election on the ground that two (Weiser and Lambing) were “supervisors” under Section 2(11) of the Act, and the third (Emme), as a college student employed for the summer of the election, had an insufficient community of interest with the other employees to vote. Upon consideration of the entire record and the briefs the Court concludes that the Board’s decision as to Weiser and Lambing is supported by substantial evidence. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider its decision as to Emme.

Accordingly, the order of the Board is enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F.2d 242, 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2435, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childers-products-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1981.