Child Welfare Administration v. Marsha C.

225 A.D.2d 766, 640 N.Y.2d 143, 640 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3220
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The undisputed medical evidence at the hearing indicates that the appellant physically abused his six-week old son, Maurice, by inflicting injuries, including a fractured skull, which ultimately caused the baby’s death. Based on its finding that the appellant had abused Maurice, the Family Court made a finding of derivative abuse with regard to the appellant’s daughter, Tia, who was approximately one year old at the time of Maurice’s death.

Considering the nature of the injury to Maurice, the evidence supports the conclusion that Tia was at risk of being subjected to similar abuse (see, Matter of Eli G., 189 AD2d 764; Matter of Ely P., 167 AD2d 473, 475). The Family Court’s finding of derivative abuse with regard to Tia was, therefore, proper (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [e]). Copertino, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Child Welfare Administration v. Marsha C., 225 A.D.2d 766, 640 N.Y.2d 143, 640 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 766 (Child Welfare Administration v. Marsha C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Amirah L.
37 Misc. 3d 1003 (NYC Family Court, 2012)
In re Alijah C.
302 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Johnnie S.
272 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re Jose B.
262 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)