Child v. C. H. Winans Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Child v. C. H. Winans Co.

183 A. 300, 119 N.J. Eq. 556, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 658

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery sustaining complainant’s claim that lands now owned by the *563 defendant are subject to an equitable (vendor’s) lien for the payment of taxes and assessments on adjacent lands owned by the complainant.

We have examined the proofs and concur in the findings of Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

The decree will be affirmed.

For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery sustaining complainant’s claim that lands now owned by the *563 defendant are subject to an equitable (vendor’s) lien for the payment of taxes and assessments on adjacent lands owned by the complainant.

We have examined the proofs and concur in the findings of Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

The decree will be affirmed.

For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.

Child v. C. H. Winans Co., 183 A. 300, 119 N.J. Eq. 556, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 658 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

183 A. 300 (Child v. C. H. Winans Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related