Child v. C. H. Winans Co.
This text of 183 A. 300 (Child v. C. H. Winans Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery sustaining complainant’s claim that lands now owned by the *563 defendant are subject to an equitable (vendor’s) lien for the payment of taxes and assessments on adjacent lands owned by the complainant.
We have examined the proofs and concur in the findings of Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
The decree will be affirmed.
For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 A. 300, 119 N.J. Eq. 556, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/child-v-c-h-winans-co-nj-1936.