CHIEN

10 I. & N. Dec. 387
CourtBoard of Immigration Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1963
Docket1307
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 I. & N. Dec. 387 (CHIEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CHIEN, 10 I. & N. Dec. 387 (bia 1963).

Opinion

Interim Decision #1307

MATTER OF CHIEN

In DEPORTATION Proceedings A-10107638 Decided by Board October 29, 1963 An oxelumge vigitur alien who hog boon granted a waiver of the foreign-residence requirement provided by section 212(e), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, is not precluded by section 244(f) (2) from establishing statutory eligibility for suspension of deporation under section 244(a) (1). Cl/ARGE :

Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2)3—Itemained longer—admission as a nonimmigrant student and change of status to exchange visitor.

The case comes forward pursuant to certification by the special in- quiry officer of his decision dated August 2, 1963 ordering that the de- portation of the respondent be suspended under the provisions of sec- tion 244(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. Discussion as to Deportability: The respondent is a native and citizen of China, 32 years old, male, who last entered the United States on September 19, 1954, at which time he was admitted as a nonimmi- grant student. His status was changed on May 8, 1959 to that of an exchange visitor and he was subsequently granted until July 16, 1963 to effect his voluntary departure from the United States. On December 28, 1962 the grant of voluntary departure was rescinded and the respondent acknowledged that he has remained in the United States thereafter without authority. Deportability is conceded and is found to be established as charged in the order to show cause. Discussion as to Eligibility for Suspension of Deportation: The respondent was married on April 7, 1957. His wife had en- tered the United States on November 3, 1956 as an exchange vis- itor and is the beneficiary of a waiver of the two-year foreign resi- dence requirement. They have two children, approximately four and two years of age, both native-born citizens of the United States. The respondent's wife is a pediatrician but is presently active only as a housewife. She and the children are dependent entirely upon the

387 Interim Decision #1307 respondent for support. The respondent is an assistant professor of psychology at Columbia University College of Physicians and Sur- geons, engaged in problems of wound shock under contract with the Office of the Army Surgeon General, and earns approximately $12,000 per year. His assets consist of $500 in savings and personal effects valued at $2500. Letters from professional associates and friends, reprints of re- spondent's articles in various scientific publications and other docu- mentary evidence have been submitted. This evidence establishes that the respondent has been continuously physically present in the United States since the time of entry, a period of at least the preceding seven years. A check of the local appropriate local and federal records have failed to reveal an arrest or criminal record against the respondent. Inquiry disclosed that he has no connection with subversive groups. Affidavits of witnesses and an independent character investigation establish that he has been a person of good moral character for more than the preceding seven years. The respondent meets the good moral character requirement for suspension of deportation as well as the other requirement of a continuous period of residence of not less than seven years immediately preceding the date of his application, and the requirement that his deportation would result in extreme hardship to himself as well as his spouse and children, the latter of whom are citizens of the United States. The respondent is the beneficiary of a visa petition filed in his be- half by Columbia University on 'Tune 11, 1962 approved by the Service on July 15, 1962 granting him preference status under section 908 (a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. At the request of the Department of Defense, based upon his research in the field of hemor- rhagic shock and radiation syndrome for the Office of the Army Sur- geon General, he has been granted a. waiver of the foreign residence requirement for exchange visitors -under section 212(e) of the Immi- gration and Nationality Act. However, since the first preference por- tion of the quota for Chinese persons is oversubscribed presently, the respondent cannot readily obtain an immigrant visa to otherwise adjust his immigration status. The respondent's case is an extremely meritorious one and he quali- fies for suspension of deportation in every respect except for the ap- parent bar interposed by section 244(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Aet as amended by the Act of October 24, 1962 (76 Stat. 1247, P1.87-885) which provides : (f) No provision of this section shall be applicable to an alien who * * * (2) was admitted to the United States pursuant to section 101(a) (15) (J) or has acquired such status after admission to the United States ; * * *

388 Interim Decision #1307 The respondent acquired the status of an exchange visitor on May 8, 1959. However, he has been granted a waiver of the two-year foreign residence required for a change of status under section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. There remains to be considered whether an alien who has an exchange visitor status but who has been granted a waiver of the foreign residence requirement comes within the bar of section 211(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. The primary purpose of the Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 was to promote international good will by mutual exchange of persons to observe and study on the one hand and to teach im- portant knowledge on the other. In establishing this program Con- gress anticipated that the alien would employ the knowledge and skill, thus acquired as the result of a stay here, in his own country. He was declared ineligible for the privilege of suspension of deportation. The ban against granting suspension of deportation to exchange visitors was incorporated into section 402(f) of the Immigration and Na- tionality Act. The Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 was amended on June 4,1956 (Public Law 84-555) to provide that no person acquiring exchange status thereafter would be eligible for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence unless he had been phys- ically present in, a cooperating country for a period of two years fol- lowing departure from the United States, except that such two-year requirement might be waived by the Attorney General in the ease of an alien whose admission to the United States was found by the At- torney General to be in the public interest. Section 201 of the Information and Educational Exchange Act was repealed by the Mutual Exchange and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (Public Law 87 256) and the two year foreign residence requirement - -

and waiver provisions in somewhat revised form were incorporated into section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality -Act and sec- tion 101(a) (15) (J) was added to include exchange visitors as a spe- cific category of nonimmigrants. Although section 244(f) of the Im- migration and Nationality Act as amended on October 24, 1962 at first glance would also appear to bar voluntary departure to the classes of aliens enumerated therein, such a construction was rejected in favor of an interpretation allowing such relief in the cases of crewmen? In commenting on the proposed amendment of section 244 by the Act of October 24, 1962 the Congressional discussion as stated by Congressman Feighan stated as follows: "Suspension of deportation will not be available to alien crewmen and to persons who come to

1 Matter of Varga Rodrigues, Int. Dec. 1254.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O-J-O
21 I. & N. Dec. 381 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1996)
PEREYRA
16 I. & N. Dec. 590 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 I. & N. Dec. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chien-bia-1963.